May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


The Sled:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Weblog Comments

Return to the Weblog

Quote of the Day - I got tired of not being able to download my own music. - Madonna

First Music Download Trial Verdict May Get Overturned

Late last year, Jammie Thomas was found guilty by a Minnesota jury of pirating music and violating the record companies' copyrights in that music, and ordered to pay $220,000.  Next month, she may get a new trial.

Ruling from the bench right before the October 2007 trial, U.S. District Court Judge Michael J. Davis agreed with the record industry lawyers and issued a jury instruction that said making sound recordings available without the record companies' permission violates their copyrights "regardless of whether actual distribution has been shown."

Thomas' lawyers argued that only the record company downloaded the music allegedly copied by Thomas, and that no actual distribution occurred.  In reconsidering his ruling, Judge Davis indicated that a case relied on by the record companies was recently vacated.  Hearings are set for next month on the issue.

Meanwhile, there's no clear guidance on this point.  District Courts across the country are issuing contrary rulings, which may require an appellate opinion to resolve the disputes.

Typically, a copyright violation requires republication, a sale or some other type of use.  Music download advocates argue that copying for personal use is not a copyright violation, while some record companies take the opposite position. 

Meanwhile, stay tuned, and don't click on that copy button. 

Posted by J. Craig Williams on 5/16/2008 at 00:01 Comments (1)

 

Comments

Comments by Joe from United States on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 at 10:41

Many record companies were asleep while newer technologies were being invented, and now they're attempting to punish the public for their incompetance. Suing and threatening college students with jail time was and is their tool to keep consumers from exploring new technologies. The big labels cried that they weren't to blame for their loss in revenue, rather it was the public's fault for stealing. How can we expect to have sympathy for their incompetance. It's like horse salesmen suing car manufacturers for their loss of business.

 

Comments are now closed.

Send your comments directly to the author at jcraigwms at wlf-law.com (remove spaces and add @ symbol in place of the "at").