May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Quote of the Day - This is a get-out-of-liability-free card. - John Russo
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo
There are 2033 Journal Items on 255 page(s) and you are on page number 247

No Lift for this Lift Kit

If you’re going to sue, sue. Don’t just sit there.

Anthony Choy installed a lift kit on his car, and then promptly lost control of the car and severely injured himself in an accident. How he got to sue anyone else is a mystery, but he did.

He bought the lift kit from Shamrock Tire, and Shamrock was insured by Redland Insurance Company, part of the Clarendon Insurance Group (rating recently downgraded). Not surprisingly, Choy sued Shamrock. Not surprisingly, Shamrock filed bankruptcy.

Here’s where it gets dicey. Choy tendered a policy limits demand to Redland for $500,000. Redland rejected the demand. Deals were made in Shamrock’s bankruptcy, and ultimately, Choy ended up with a bankruptcy claim for about $26K. The trustee approved the claim, the bankruptcy court approved the claim, but when the trustee sued Redland Insurance to collect the claim, the case was dismissed. The appellate court upheld the dismissal. Boom. Case over.

The trustee’s case was dismissed ultimately because no one ever bothered to prosecute to judgment the underlying case for liability. It’s very simple in insurance lingo. No judgment, no payment. No one ever proved that Shamrock was liable for Choy’s injuries. (See also the second paragraph, above). Now, the attorneys, trustee and practically everyone else is embroiled in litigation to sort all of this out.

That is, everyone but Redland. They’re just continuing to collect premiums and not pay out claims.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Friday, September 26, 2003 at 09:35. Comments Closed (0) |

We Can Pay Any Punitive Damages You Can Award

Hats off to my former partner, Dan Callahan of Callahan & Blaine, who just pulled down a $934 million dollar victory. The news hasn't made it to their website yet, but it is in the print version of today's Los Angeles Daily Journal (right most column, and third story down on this internet page).

Dan represented a medical equipment manufacturer, Beckman Coulter, and Gary Waldron of Waldron & Olsen and Scott Farrell of Call, Jensen & Farrell (I couldn't find either of their sites) represented Dovatron, whose parent is Flextronics. Supposedly trading was halted after the verdict, by it appears that the stock is still being traded, although it's fallen 4.73% at the time of this post. Not surprisingly, Waldron nor Farrell returned calls to the Daily Journal. Dan, of course, played to the paper.

According to the article, "The jury was instructed - at the behest of Flextronic's counsel, according to Callahan - that the company was capable of paying any punitive award it may deliver. 'They stipulated they could pay any punitive damage allowed by law,' he said. 'I believe that tactic backfired on them. Their rationale was they did not want to expose their financial records in any more depth to the jury, but I believe it gave the jury a sense of arrogance and lack of remorse.'"

In order to get to that little tidbit, you have to wade through the entire article. I don't think I would have put that revelation at the end of the article.

That revelation is $850 million of the verdict. Arrogance costs a lot these days.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, September 25, 2003 at 11:23. Comments Closed (0) |

Spam- Soon to be Illegal in California

Just a scant 30 minutes ago, Governor in Waiting Gray Davis signed SB 186, banning spam in California. The bill makes it illegal for spammers to send unsolicited email. The estimates in the bill are that 40% of all email sent is spam, and by the end of this year alone, it will reach 50%, costing us over $1.2 billion dollars.

Fines are stiff: $1,000 for each violation and up to $1,000,000 for a email blitz campaign. The bill also provides for an award of attorneys fees to the prevailing plaintiff. The Los Angeles Times article quotes the Bill's author, State Senator Kevin Murray, who says it will be easy to collect these fines.

The bill applies to "'Commercial e-mail advertisement[s']' [, which] means any electronic mail message initiated for the purpose of advertising or promoting the lease, sale, rental, gift offer, or other disposition of any property, goods, services, or extension of credit." The bill goes into effect January 1, 2004, and does not apply retroactively.

The bill also requires email senders to provide an opt-out method - either in the email itself or an 800 number. Most other states have Spam laws, but California's is comparatively harsh. It will likely set a new standard for other states and the federal government.

Plus, it will be a crime to send unsolicited email in California. So not only can regular citizens sue spammers, the AG and DA can file charges. Ouch!

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 at 07:52. Comments Closed (1) |

The Death of an Indian Chief

The Indian Chief may once again ride off into the sunset. Yesterday, Indian Motorcyles halted production and laid off its entire workforce of 380 in Gilroy, California.

Initially started in 1913, the company folded in 1953, but rumbled slowly back to life in 1999, according to an Associated Press article. The article points out that just last year, Indian introduced its own motor, the Power Plus, which creates an exhaust sound different than the infamous Harley-Davidson sound. (Check out the "Sounds of Harley-Davidson" box. After you scroll down, look on the right.) For a short sample of the Indian sound, click on the "Feel the Power" link on the site's home page.

Now, the Indian company has 200 dealers across the country and had hoped to produce 4,500 bikes this year. Before WWI, Indian had produced as many as 20,000 bikes. Just recently, funds ran low, and the company's main investor backed out, leaving Indian high and dry.

Dozens of investors have called offering help, but the company is weighing bankruptcy options. This sad event may have been coming for some time. The job application section of the company's website notes that no jobs are available at this time

If you were ever thinking about owning an new Indian, now may be your last chance.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 at 08:42. Comments Closed (0) |

The Kozinski

I'm watching CSPAN right now, and trying to watch/listen to the oral arguments on the California Recall. CSPAN's servers must be overloaded. Although the video is good, the sound is intermittent. We don't have a cable feed at the office yet.

Oh well, I'll just have to wait for the pundits to tell me what was said.

Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski may have given a surreptitous signal during the oral arguments while on TV. This post is pure speculation (right - like any good lawyer, I think I already know the answer).

During his first question, Judge Kozinski gave a noticeable "tug" on his ear, a la Carol Burnett. The "Tug" is generally known as Burnett's signal as a greeting to her Texas family.

Was Kozinski (born in Bucharest, Rumania, a long way from Texas) greeting anyone? Enquiring minds want to know. Any ideas out there?

P.S. Kozinski may have been one of the first judicial bloggers, having written a 10-day electronic journal for formerly MSN's Slate magazine.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, September 22, 2003 at 13:33. Comments Closed (0) |

USEPA Just Can't Get It Right - 17 Years Later

Last week, while it wasn't fielding California recall briefs, the 9th Circuit decided a little-known case with very little fanfare. It will, however, have lasting effects. In three consolidated cases, the Environmental Defense Center, Natural Resourses Defense counsel and the American Forest & Paper Association sued the USEPA. These actions were first filed in the Fifth, Ninth and D.C. Circuits, and then consolidated in the Ninth.

The import of the case boils down to two changes in the USEPA Phase II rule for storm water discharges. Previously, when a construction site between one and five acres or a MS4 (essentially a small municipality) applied for a NPDES stormwater permit, the USEPA did not require review of the notice of intent to comply. In a word, the USEPA rule allowed self-regulation.

Now, however, with this Ninth Circuit ruling, the Court required USEPA to go back to the drawing board and add in provisions for public notice and public hearings. As a consequence of this ruling, the USEPA will eventually require review and comment before approving the permits, which will make the permits harder to obtain and subject to challenge by environmental groups like the Plaintiffs in these cases, the EDC and the NRCD.

It only took the USEPA 13 years to promulgate this rule, and four years to wind its way through the court system. We'll see how long it takes this time.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, September 22, 2003 at 09:59. Comments Closed (0) |

Harvard, Indeed

Fellow blogger Phillip Greenspun reports that Miss America is indeed on her way to Harvard.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Sunday, September 21, 2003 at 18:05. Comments Closed (0) |

Harvard Law School Will Never Be The Same

It's the weekend, OK?

Although MIPTC has tackled some women's issues in recent entries, I couldn't resist one from last night's Miss America pageant. Apparently, this year's winner is Miss Florida.

Where's the legal news? Read on.

Apparently, Miss Florida now Miss America Erika Dunlap is attending the Univsersity of Central Florida and wants to become a lawyer. Not just any lawyer, though, she wants to become a Sports and Entertainment lawyer.

But, before then, she's going to take a year off to "tout her social program of cultural diversity and inclusiveness," according to this article. Reporter Laura Farr also gave us this tidbit: "She also succeeded in the evening gown competition wearing a luminous yellow strapless gown."

Kind of like Legally Blonde, except without the pink gown.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Sunday, September 21, 2003 at 15:23. Comments Closed (0) |



Page:  << Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247 248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  Next >>

Back to top.