May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Quote of the Day - Law and order is one of the stepes taken to maintain injustice. - A. Bonar Law
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo
There are 2033 Journal Items on 255 page(s) and you are on page number 241

Air Pollution Control Enforcement Eased Back

The USEPA may drop investigations of coal-burning power plants, refineries and factories allegedly violating clean air laws.

An EPA official said senior agency managers were told earlier this week in Seattle to stop current investigations and enforcement work unless past activities violated the new, less vigorous air quality rules. If true, the retroactive application of new regs to possible past violations would be unprecedented.

Senator Jim Jeffords (I-VT.) a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said the instructions - attributed to J.P. Suarez, USEPA's enforcement chief - are of concern.

"First the administration weakens our clean air law, and now it won't enforce it," Jeffords said. "Instead of fighting pollution, this administration is at war with the Clean Air Act. Innocent bystanders, such as children, the elderly and the infirm, will be the principal casualties."

USEPA did not make Suarez available Wednesday but issued an agency statement. "As the agency has consistently stated, we are vigorously pursuing all filed cases and we will evaluate each pending investigation on a case-by-case basis to determine whether it will be pursued or set aside."

Eric Schaeffer, a former EPA civil enforcement chief who heads the Rockefeller Family Fund's Environmental Integrity Project, said the USEPA could drop investigations of more than 70 power companies and 50 other industrial facilities.

Scott Segal, director of the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, a group of power companies, said Schaeffer's characterization of the Seattle meeting is misleading. "All indications are that existing filed cases ... are being aggressively pursued by the federal government."

The Clinton administration sued 51 older power plants and forced installation of hundreds of millions of dollars of pollution-control equipment. About half the companies sued have since settled, eliminating about 7 million tons of pollutants annually.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Friday, November 07, 2003 at 09:10. Comments Closed (0) |

If You Dare to Read Them

Although I haven't looked, some may want to. If you dare, here are some documents in the case of Washington v. Gary Leon Ridgeway, the guy who just admitted to 48 Murders. Here's the Green River killer's plea agreement.

And just in case you're a glutton, here's the Defendant's statement.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, November 06, 2003 at 17:43. Comments Closed (0) |

What the USEPA Doesn't Know Won't Hurt US

Today in Chicago will be the first of five national dialogue sessions to solicit feedback on the "Draft Report on the Environment," (ROE) issued on June 23. The USEPA and its regional offices will conduct these sessions across the country.

This report presents the first national picture of US environmental conditions and health across five key areas: air, water, land, human health and ecosystems. USEPA has invited representatives from federal, state and local government, tribes, academia, nongovernmental organizations and private industry.

By the way, USEPA says that interested citizens will also have an opportunity to provide comments during each meeting. Thanks for remembering us common folk.

The five sessions will be held, Nov. 6 in Chicago, Region 5; Nov. 13 in Atlanta, Region 4; Nov. 18 in San Francisco, Region 9; Nov. 20 in Seattle, Region 10; and Dec. 12 in Dallas, Region 6. For specific information where in each city, send an email to Dawn Banks-Waller at the USEPA.

You can get a copy of the regular report or the scientific report and comment online, too.

According to the Executive Summary, the ROE will also tell us what the USEPA doesn't know about the environment.

So, if they don't know, how are they going to tell us they don't know? This will likely be the government's first attempt at existentialism.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, November 06, 2003 at 08:21. Comments Closed (0) |

Mishmash of Special Interests form Energy Bill

The 2003 Energy bill - the first of its kind in 10 years - appears to have stalled. The Sierra Club, Public Citizen, Public Ark, the Wilderness Society and U.S. PIRG don't like it. In fact, it's hard to find much support for it.

President Bush has championed it, pointing to the rolling blackouts last summer as a reason to pass the bill.

The Environmental and Energy Study Institute published this summary of the bill. The White House has its own summary.

This debate has been going on for some time, and sees no signs of letting up. When the bill was first introduced by the White House in 2001, PBS offered us this round-up. The bill has made it through the House, but is now bogged down in the Senate.

Environmentalists are making their last stand. Professional energy lobbyists are pushing hard to loosen the regulations preventing oil drilling and restricting air emissions. There will be more "tweaking around the edges" to get this plan to pass, if it does at all.

It looks like we're going to end up with a hodgepodge of special interests instead of an overall, workable set of laws and regulations.

Doesn't anybody in this process see the benefit of a cohesive plan?

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Wednesday, November 05, 2003 at 08:43. Comments Closed (0) |

Tell me it ain't so, Jerry Springer

Here's one for the I coulda-told-ya-so category. Maybe it should be filed under the "No kidding" category, too.

Today's Courthouse News service gives us this little tidbit:

"In State Court in Chicago, a man who appeared on the Jerry Springer Show filed suit against another guest who assaulted him onstage. The show and its production company were also named as defendants."

As you may remember, this isn't the first time that Jerry's been sued. But, that lawsuit over the death of a woman (who admitted on the show that she had secretly remarried and was killed by her ex-husband immediately after the show aired) was later dropped.

I don't know. Call me silly. If you're a contestant (not the right word, I know) nee guest, on Jerry's show, I think there's a high likelihood you are going to be punched. Or called names. Or booed.

Kinda goes with the territory. In the law, we call it "assumption of the risk."

Of course, Jerry wouldn't have it any other way.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Tuesday, November 04, 2003 at 21:40. Comments Closed (0) |

New Source Review Rules Go Final

The USEPA's New Source Review was published in the Federal Register today, and will become final in 60 days.

It's nothing new, having been proposed in December 2002.

The final rule requires replacement components to be "functionally equivalent" to existing components. In other words, there would be no change to basic design or to emitting capacity. It also sets a 20 percent limit on replacement cost for equipment to establish thresholds for plant projects.

If these restrictions are exceeded, the replacement equipment is subject to the New Source Review process. USEPA will supposedly continue to enforce violations of the previous New Source Review rules and will vigorously enforce any violations that occur under this new equipment replacement rule.

But, the USEPA says the new rule won't effect emissions. Right. As equipment gets replaced, it must comply with NSR regs, which will ultimately end up in less emissions.

And more cost to get there.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, November 03, 2003 at 21:25. Comments Closed (0) |

Punitive Damages Available Against the Navy

The U.S. government may be liable for punitive damages in Clean Air Act cases.

This case, out of Florida's 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that the Navy could be liable for punitive damages under the Clean Air Act. Other interesting CAA links can be found on MIPTC's federal environmental links.

The City of Jacksonville alleged the Navy openly violated CAA standards for over five years, and seeks up to $10,000/day in penalties, plus punies.

Maybe it's time the government complied with its own regulations. What do you think?



Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Sunday, November 02, 2003 at 19:55. Comments Closed (0) |

Old Fire 45% Contained

Although it's a marked improvement from the "unknown containment" just days ago, 45% means the firefighters still have a long way to go. It's snowing up in the mountains, and a mere 32 degrees.

Quite a contrast with the hot Santa Ana winds, which are expected to kick back up next week.

Thanks to the Riverside Press-Enterprise for its online coverage, which has been great. Also to Rim of the World.net for unflagging news, and Ranger Al who stayed up to 4:30 a.m. this morning and awoke to phone calls at 7:00 a.m.

Mountain dweller and others who live near fire areas may want to consider Thermo-gel, an amazing, easily=applied, environmentally-friendly USFS-approved product that protects everything (I'm not kidding - plants, too) from fire.

What will they think of next? Removing fire-prone vegetation from around your home?

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Saturday, November 01, 2003 at 10:16. Comments Closed (0) |



Page:  << Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241 242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  Next >>

Back to top.