May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Quote of the Day - Math Anxiety - An intense, life-long fear of two trains approaching each other at speeds of 60 and 80 mph. - Anonymous
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo
There are 2033 Journal Items on 255 page(s) and you are on page number 239

The Blawg Roundup

Today's a blawg-reading day. As a follow-up to an earlier post, Perfectly Sassy has this post. She even features Spam University and the The 3rd Annual Nigerian Email Conference. Classic educational opportunities for the uninformed.

Denise Howell's baby is almost here, and she's trying to think of a name. After reading this article about new baby names, I suggested "TextAmerica" to her because it sounded patriotic, and tied in with her blog. I don't think she'll go for it, though.

Damn the muse makes a great point about the recent Michael Jackson flap and media strom. Who cares?

And, Happy Birthday to Ernie. And my brother, Scott, who turned 40 on the 20th. Mom called him to let him know he was born at 3:08 in the morning, weighed 7 1/2 ounces and was 21 inches long. Why does she remember these facts?

Instead of comments, the Screaming Bean has dicta. Great idea.

Stuart Levine also posts this warning and advice to bloggers who write. Get insurance.

Finally, TPB has this thought about law school. I'm glad I didn't go to that law school. Mine provided those opportunities, including arguing a case.



Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Saturday, November 22, 2003 at 10:00. Comments Closed (1) |

Thank you, Everyone

A wonderful time was had by all last night at the first annual Fall Harvest Open house at the firm.

Thanks to our judicial guests, Judge Alex Kozinski for keeping everyone in stitches, and to Justice William Bedsworth for entertaining stories, and Judge Kelly MacEachern for her warm, welcoming wishes.

Good food, good people, a relaxing, after-work party to kick off the Holiday Season. Thanks to all of our clients, vendors, friends, fellow lawyers and everyone that came - and even to those that brought us gifts. We appreciate your support, and to all, a good night.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Friday, November 21, 2003 at 17:00. Comments Closed (0) |

College Tuition & Dynamite - How They Go Together

Wonder why your kids' college education costs so much? Earlier this month, the USEPA announceed that it wants over $97,000 in fines from Vassar College in Poughkeepsie, New York for violating RCRA hazardous waste laws. You know, the Ivy League, and all that, old boy.

Actually, Vassar's not in the Ivy League, which you probably could have figured out from the USEPA's action. Would an Ivy League school have violated hazardous waste regulations? Heck, Harvard can't even win football games, let alone pollute the environment. But I digress.

The USEPA reports that complaints with penalties totaling $2 million have been levied against 10 colleges and universities, and settlements reached total $1.3 million in penalties or supplemental environmental projects. The USEPA plans additional investigations and self-audit agreements under its Colleges and Universities Initiative.

Want to know how to avoid an investigation by the USEPA into your business, college or university? Try out the voluntary self-audit program. If you follow the guidelines and disclose violations (I know it sounds oxymoronic, but remember it makes sense because this is the government), you may be eligible for reduced penalties. You must follow the "Incentives for Self Policing: Discovery, Disclosure, Correction, and Prevention of Violations" policy (this one's for Region 2 - each Region has its own guidelines, but they're pretty much the same).

This whole program started in 1999 because a USEPA inspector found two bottles of Picric Acid in a college chemical storage lab.

Think dynamite. Then run.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, November 20, 2003 at 08:53. Comments Closed (0) |

You're Kidding!!!!!! It's Not True?????

I normally don't go off on a rant here, but (choose the one on individual responsibility, and you'll get the idea), we've become blind email recipients who automatically forward whatever shows up as if it were the gospel handed down on two tablets.

News flash: not all emails are true. This MSN article features the top nine email hoaxes. As many of you know, of all of them, I would be most tempted to fall for the $250 Nieman Marcus chocolate chip recipe email. You know, the one that says some lady got charged $250 for the recipe, but wants revenge and is giving it away, and you just have to pay shipping and handling. I love really good chocolate chip cookies.

But, it's a hoax. I was so disappointed. Until I went to the Neiman Marcus website, and discovered that they've actually published the recipe. For free. No hoax, no kidding.

Of people that were bilked last year and not embarrased enough to report it, the average individual lost $468.00. Apparently, the Nigeran money offer is the scam most fall for. To quote MSN, "There is a billion, kazillion dollars in an account here that rightfully belongs to my family and my people. Due to some horrid-bloody military coup in which my entire family, several accountants and various goats lost their lives, I cannot reach this money. But you, an American who has never heard of my country, can march right into the corner branch of God-Forsaken-War-Torn-East-of-Nowhere-Africa and deposit this money right into your fat American bank account. For your trouble, I'll give you a few million off the top -- because what's a few million between confidential best friends who have never actually even heard of one another?"

Such a deal. Where do I sign up? Oh, it's not true? Say it ain't so. I could use a few million. Even the Secret Service issued a warning about the scam, as well as the Internet Fraud Complaint Center.

Email is not the only scam out there, as you undoubtedly know. So too for securities, commission-free trades, and surprise of all surprises, telemarketers. Has the No-call list gone into effect yet? I can't wait.

My all-time favorite, though, are those people who feel compelled to warn me about computer virus hoaxes. Don't fall prey to these emails, either. Check out Symantec's security hoax page before you click on forward in order to save my computer. It's one less piece of email I don't need (huh?).

By the way, Congress is passing a law this session, and it's titled: If it's too good to be true, it isn't. Would it help if I put five exclamation marks after that statement to make it appear true?????



Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Wednesday, November 19, 2003 at 08:14. Comments Closed (1) |

NIMBY Turns Into NIMO

Cape Wind Associates is attempting to build a wind farm in Nantucket Sound. Not all nearby residents are too happy about the plan. This Google search resulted in numerous articles and organizations both for and against the proposal.

Another company, Winenergy, LLC has at least 14 wind farm proposals pending for East Coast oceans.

Oceans aren't the only place where wind farms have popped up - we have them right here in Palm Springs, Califorina, too. They're in Minnesota, Ohio and Pennsylvania and many other states.

This Department of Energy site says wind farms are also in Colorado, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North and South Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming. Not surprisingly, they're in Holland, too.

Admittedly, they're an eyesore. But, windmills are nothing new to the American landscape. They come from one of the Old Countries, too. Holland and England's national treasures have inspired individuals, as well.

Many people have installed windmills for themselves. There is much support for this form of individualism; the bibliography for small projects is amazingly extensive. Small projects are generally accepted, but the big projects meet stiff opposition.

The general concept opposing these large farms is NIMBY. I think the arguments against windmills in oceans will have to be called NIMO - Not in My Ocean.

There are good arguments on both sides. Clean energy, no pollution vs. dangers to navigation (in oceans) and scarring the landscape. But, I have to ask, are we just Don Quixote, tilting at windmills?

You know I wouldn't have missed that pun.

Surprisingly, there's an actual product called NIMBY to keep pests out of your backyard. Maybe it was all the wind farm opponents bought up these spray bottles - the product's website notes that they're out of stock until 2004.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 08:10. Comments Closed (0) |

14 States File to Enjoin Loosened Air Act Regs

The Clean Air Act, which I've written about before, is in the news again.

This time, 14 States Attorneys General (did I get those plurals right?) sought an injunction today to stop the USEPA's move to relax regs on December 26. Apparently, a late present from the USEPA to the President.

The spoilers (attorneys general) representing the states are all Democrats, save one. Former Attorney General Peter Heed of New Hampshire is the sole Republican joining in this suit.

According to published articles, a spokesman for the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council redicted the effort would fail. "This is just another attempt by the attorney general to delay reforms that will improve efficiency and reduce emissions," said the spokesman, Frank Maisano.

"If these rules go into effect even temporarily," said New York former State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, "utilities will get the green light to spew forth pollution and violate the clear meaning of a statute that has for decades protected the quality of the air that we breathe."

USEPA spokeswoman Cynthia Bergman said the agency had not yet seen Monday's filing, but accused Spitzer of "making charges without having facts."

Lawyers. They all look at the same thing and see it five different ways. Oh yeah - that's what I do, too!

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, November 17, 2003 at 20:33. Comments Closed (0) |

Lawsuits Over MTBE Contamination May Soon Go Away

MTBE Safe Drinking Water Act lawsuits may become a thing of the past.

House Majority Leader Tom Delay, R-Texas placed a provision in the pending Energy Bill in Congress that would grant retroactive immunity to MTBE manufacturers from most, if not all, pending lawsuits. These suits allege contamination of drinking water supplies.

Many MTBE manufacturers are in Delay's home state, Texas, and some manufacturers have already been held liable for damage caused by the fuel additive. In California, MTBE is slated to be
phased out as an additive.

The U.S. Conference of Mayors opposes this grant of immunity. It "will put the cost of pollution cleanup on local taxpayers rather than the polluters," James Garner, president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors said in a statement Saturday.

On the other hand, MTBE manufacturers argue that the product liability waiver is justified because MTBE would not be a problem if people didn't spill gasoline or if the fuel didn't leak from damaged underground storage tanks.

Right. And cigarettes wouldn't kill people if they just wouldn't smoke them. Now if we just knew for sure that MTBE was chronically dangerous.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Sunday, November 16, 2003 at 10:36. Comments Closed (0) |

How Much for that Hammer?

Somebody's not telling the truth here.

Last March, the U.S. Forest Service told its workers that it was studying privitazing their jobs. The studies were supposed to cost $10 million, but questions have arisen over that number.

It turns out that the studies cost $24 million, according to the same AP writer, Robert Gehrke.

All to eliminate 41 jobs. Gehrke points out that the study determined that the government would actually spend $425,000 a year more to eliminate these jobs.

In a later paragraph, Gehrke quotes Thomas Mills, deputy chief for business operations at the Forest Service. According to Gehrke's quote, Mills "defends the studies and the decision to privatize Vester's team. He [Mills] said competitive sourcing will save the Forest Service $6.1 million a year, meaning the initiative will pay for itself in four years."

Which one is it Mr. Gehrke?

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Saturday, November 15, 2003 at 10:19. Comments Closed (0) |



Page:  << Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239 240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  Next >>

Back to top.