May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Quote of the Day - I'm just trying to simulate some thinking on this subject. - Anonymous
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo
There are 2033 Journal Items on 255 page(s) and you are on page number 237

Air Pollution: Getting Less Fast Enough?

The USEPA indicated yesterday that because the Clear Skies Initiative is bogged down in Congress, it will begin establishing regulations to do the same thing.

If you can't beat 'em, go around 'em.

Air advocates are hopping mad. "The reality is that what they are proposing will still allow industry to pollute too much for too long," said Frank O'Donnell, executive director of Clean Air Trust. "And that will lead to continuing unnecessary health problems."

New USEPA Chief Mike Leavitt says that the regs will cut mercury emissions by 70 percent from 48 tons to 15 tons by 2018. If you click the link, you'll see that this is not news - it's something they haven't done for the last three years. The plan will also establish a type of pollution credit trading program for large utilities.

The new regs would also reduce sulfur dioxide emissions from power plants from about 10 million tons a year to 3.2 million tons by 2015. Also, nitrogen oxide would drop from 4 million tons annually to 1.7 million tons.

Another air advocate group, Environmental Defense had no issue with the trading program, but claimed "reductions ought to be deeper than being proposed."

Other environmental groups have criticized pollution credit trading for allowing the development of "hot spots" of higher pollution around homes and schools. They claim increased emissions are possible just by purchasing credits instead of reducing emissions.

Looks like we're moving forward, just not fast enough for everyone's tastes.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Friday, December 05, 2003 at 09:14. Comments Closed (0) |

Dirty Harry's New Law for 2004

Well, it's time to start thinking about next year's new laws. I still haven't even started my Christmas shopping yet, but I'm already beset by a bevy of new laws. This one's right up there with Court TV's Stupid Crimes and Misdemeanors. There's usually a good crop of candidates there for the Darwin Awards, too, if you're looking for some runners-up.

Anyway, I'm getting off track. New laws.

In California, if you go to the movie theater with your camcorder and videotape the movie before January 1, you will not have violated this crime. There are likely a number of other crimes and copyrights you will have violated, but not this one.

After the New Year, it's $2,500 and up to one year in jail for videotaping a movie in a theater. And, the guy with the popcorn next to you can make a citizen's arrest if he spots you. Only New York, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia have similar laws.

Los Angeles City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo tried to get into the news with this sound bite: "These thieves are stealing from Los Angeles and are stealing from American creativity." Wtih a palm-sized camcorder in one hand, Delgadillo stole a line from the Dirty Harry movie: "If you carry one of these into a movie theater, you have to ask yourself, 'Do I feel lucky?'"

Me? I'll just rent the DVD when it comes out. It's cheaper than buying a camcorder.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, December 04, 2003 at 22:10. Comments Closed (0) |

Enlibra - More Regulation Than Enforcement

USEPA head bureaucrat Mike Leavitt gave his first speech yesterday.

Heavy on regulations, snappy titles for new programs (Enlibra), and light on enforcement. In fact, Leavitt said, "What about enforcement? I want our first goal to be compliance." Good news for business, bad news for environmentalists.

Leavitt explained Enlibra this way, "I subscribe to an environmental philosophy called Enlibra. It’s a Latin derivative meaning “to move toward balance.” Read compromise.

No judgments here, it's a wait and see attitude.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 at 23:02. Comments Closed (0) |

New USEPA Chief to Speak About Clean Air Plan

In about an hour, we'll hear the first public speech from the new USEPA chief, Mike Leavitt, Utah's former governor.

In case you're wondering about Leavitt's policies, click here. Here's what he has said about the environment.

According to a USEPA press release, "Leavitt has repeatedly stated that 'environmental protection needs to be more than an agency – it needs to be an ethic,'" a statement that doesn't appear on this
full quote page.

In any event, Leavitt's talk should identify where the USEPA will be going in the near future. So far, his past has not met with much support. CNN reported that environmental groups were not pleased with his nomination.

But, let's give him a chance. Leavitt's speech is expected to detail a nationwide clean air plan. No matter what he says, though, vocal critics of the USEPA's relaxation of air rules will surely speak out after the talk.

You can read about it here tomorrow.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Tuesday, December 02, 2003 at 07:13. Comments Closed (0) |

Commonalities in Polygamy and Same Sex Marriages

OK, you're right. I don't normally pander to prurient interests. Plus, who needs one more article about polygamy? But, I can't resist this one, especially given how many people have been asking my opinion as a lawyer on the recent spate of decisions on same sex marriages.

I can pick hot topics, can't I?

Well, here's a new twist on an old saw. Detod Legal News posted an AP report that an avowed polygamist believes his case is no different than the cases courts have recently made in favor of same sex marriages.

As a lawyer, I can see his reasoning. I mean if the social policy against same sex marriages is based on lack of procreation, then this guy's made his point. After all, he's got 30 children.

But of course, that's not the "rest of the story." Apparently, according to the AP article, this polygamist allegedly "married" a 13-year old, and he's up on charges of failure to pay child support. I make a good living, but I wouldn't want to see that bill at the end of the month.

For anyone who's wondering, I don't endorse polygamy, although I have to admit .... well, never mind. And to be totally clear, I'll quote the AP report, "Polygamy was renounced by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in 1890 as part of a deal to grant Utah statehood, and the church now excommunicates those members who practice or advocate it. "

There you have it. Notice how I completely avoided giving my opinion on these two issues? Well, if you have to know, I'm a libertarian, so I don't really care whether same sex marriages or polygamy are approved or not.

But I do want to know if that polygamy guy succeeds. Maybe he's got something going there...

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, December 01, 2003 at 22:19. Comments Closed (0) |

Holidays, Friends, Great Food and Thankfulness

Thanksgiving is over, Christmas and Chanauka and Kwanzaa are just around the corner.

Ramadan is over, as well as Los Dias de los Muertos.

Whew! Did I cover all the bases? Personally, I celebrate Haloween, Thanksgiving and Christmas. I don't even think I get the other days off.

So in this brief interlude, I'm catching up on sleep (something that's sorely lacking these days) and got to get away this weekend. Of course, before I could I had to go over billing and finish preparing for an arbitration early next week. That took up a fair chunk of yesterday and today. Do I sound like I'm complaining?

If so, I really don't mean to be that way. I'm up at the cabin this weekend, and as some readers know, we survived the Old Fire that came dangerously close to Running Springs.

To see your house standing makes your appreciate what you've got. There were many homes that didn't make it. It makes you appreciate a lot of things you don't normally think about.

During the fire coverage, one of the TV news stations incorrectly broadcast that my friends' business, the Storybook Inn had burned down. But no fear, we had dinner last night in their new restaurant, The View (click on The View Menu). The food was excellent and moderately priced - which is saying a lot for mountain restaurants. Up here, restaurants open and close frequently, and when you find one like this, it's time to give it publicity.

Richard and Patty's Storybook Inn is also a great Bed & Breakfast, with fun theme rooms throughout their large property. There are also some spectacular photographs of the incredible 100-mile views from their sunporch.

The fire devastation makes things look like a moonscape. The nice thing is that the forest repopulates itself quickly, and the sunsets are still spectacular.

I am thankful for friends, holidays, great food and a cabin that is still standing.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Sunday, November 30, 2003 at 14:30. Comments Closed (0) |

Not Blackwells' List - 13 Judicial Hellholes

The American Tort Reform Association has labeled our own Los Angeles County Court system a judicial hellhole.

Yes, it's absolutely true. I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried. In fact, we're one of 13 hellholes in the country, and several others that qualified for "dishonorable mention." You can download the entire report here if you don't believe me.

Never fear, though, several communities have been highlighted as "points of light."

The ATRA is upset at million and billion dollar verdits, and they've created this "Hellhole" report to identify those jurisdictions that have crossed the River of Styx. Most defendants, too, get upset with verdicts like that.

The group defines the phenomenon: "Judicial hellholes" are cities, counties, or judicial districts that attract lawsuits from around the nation or the region because they are correctly perceived as very plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions. They are places where the law is not applied evenhandedly to all litigants. In these areas, there is a systematic bias against defendants, particularly those located outside of the state.

They even quote one judicial author (West Virginia Supreme Court Justice Richard Neeley) who said, "As long as I am allowed to redistribute wealth from out-of-state companies to injured in-state plaintiffs, I shall continue to do so. Not only is my sleep enhanced when I give someone's else money away, but so is my job security, because the in-state plaintiffs, their families, and their friends will reelect me .... It should be obvious that the instate local plaintiff, his witnesses and his friends, can all vote for the judge, while the out-of-state defendants can't even be relied upon to send a campaign donation."

Ouch.

Next time I go to Court in Los Angeles, I'll be looking for judges in bright red robes in the red devil lounge. Then I'll know which courtrooms to stay away from.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Saturday, November 29, 2003 at 10:23. Comments Closed (0) |

And Then There Were Three

Denise Howell, blogger extrordinaire, now has a new, as-yet unnamed baby. I'm still voting for Textie, though.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Friday, November 28, 2003 at 19:30. Comments Closed (0) |



Page:  << Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237 238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  Next >>

Back to top.