May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Categories [more]
General (1982)
Lawyer 2 Lawyer (283)
Latest Blogs
This Month's Posts [more]
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Links of Interest [more]
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Quote of the Day - I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. - Jerome K. Jerome
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo

Insurance Company Drafted Its Own Exception To An Exclusion

Tennessee has recently decided that work performed by subcontractors on a project can trigger the general contractor's insurance policy, much to the dismay of Traveler's Insurance Company.  Traveler's tried to avoid liability based on this theory that the general hired all the subs, and therefore their work fell within the policy exclusion for faulty workmanship.

Perhaps Traveler's forgot to read its own policy.  The Court noted that it wasn't a judicial ruling or legislative statute that mandated the result - it was the insurance company itself.  The Court dug into the insurance industry's amendments to its own policy forms, and found that in 1986, the industry itself changed this provision that excluded work for faulty workmanship arising out of the contractor's work.

It added this language to clarify the exclusion, which reads:  "This exclusion does not apply if the damaged work or the work out of which the damage arises was performed on your behalf by a subcontractor."

The general contractor surely thought it was just desserts to have its insurance company hung out to dry by language it drafted.

Podcast 

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, October 06, 2005 at 17:15 Comments Closed (0) |
 
Share Link