Quote of the Day - When asked what the stock market will do, he replied, 'It will fluctuate.'
To $100,000, on average, for doctors.
The researchers argue that the rise in premiums is a direct consequence of the insurance companies' decrease in investment returns. You know, that old inverse proportion problem.
You gotta get money from somewhere in order to pay malpractice claims, so if investments go down, premiums go up.
The AMA disagrees, and claims that tort reforms are the answer. Insurance companies likewise blame lawyers.
I don't sue or defend doctors, so I'm arguably neutral on the point - other than my occupation as a lawyer and perhaps inherent desire to defend the profession. But I'm siding with Dartmouth on this one.
Most people know about stock market losses, and know what's happened to their own insurance premiums.
Should doctors be surprised that their malpractice premiums have increased at the same proportion that insurance investment returns have decreased? Or did they miss that day in math class?