May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Categories [more]
General (1982)
Lawyer 2 Lawyer (283)
Latest Blogs
This Month's Posts [more]
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Links of Interest [more]
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Quote of the Day - This place makes Mayberry look like a think tank. - Dennis Miller
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo

11th Circuit Court Upholds Georgia's Invalidation Of Noncompete Agreements

Noncompete agreements have taken an entirely new twist, and it's no April Fool's joke. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Marsh McLennan Companies can't enforce its noncompete agreement with one of its executives.

Unfortunately for Marsh, the dispute ended up in a Georgia court, where the law on noncompete agreements is pretty tough. So tough, in fact, that if any one provision is invalid, then the entire agreement is deemed invalid.

No such thing as a savings clause to protect the remainder of the agreement. If you're a national or international company with offices in more than one state, then you may want to think about where you litigate these cases. In California, noncompete agreements are generally unenforceable. Trade secret agreements, on the other hand, are.

Depending on what type of agreement you've structured with your employees, you want to give some thought to what court you appear trying to enforce it. Marsh, in this instance, apparently found itself in the wrong forum, and now its noncompete agreements are invalid - across the country. There's a lot of that going around lately.

Podcast 

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 at 00:52 Comments Closed (0) |
 
Share Link