May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Categories [more]
General (1984)
Lawyer 2 Lawyer (284)
Latest Blogs
This Month's Posts [more]
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Links of Interest [more]
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Quote of the Day - Use harms and even destroys beauty. The noblest function of an object is to be contemplated. - Miguel de Unamuno
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo

Form Over Function Wins Again

You've always wondered, so here it is: mannequin heads can be copyrighted.

There it is. To be copyrightable, the heads can't be useful. How's that for a conundrum?

Actually, the court decided that the case turned on the issue of whether the heads were sculpture or not. The heads took 18 months to design, and had the "hungry look" of a runway model.

Presumably, this look was designed to make the mannequins more attractive, and it apparently worked. So well, in fact, that the defendant in the case was accused of violating the copyright on the "hungry look" mannequins. The defendant responded with the allegation that the copyright on those mannequins was invalid, arguing that mannequins were not copyrightable because they were useful, not a type of artwork.

Thus, the debate over usefulness or sculpture.

Always nice to know that beauty wins out over function.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Friday, August 06, 2004 at 15:26 Comments Closed (0) |
 
Share Link