May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:


Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Categories [more]
General (1983)
Lawyer 2 Lawyer (283)
Latest Blogs
This Month's Posts [more]
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Links of Interest [more]
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Quote of the Day - When you say that you agree with a thing in principle you mean that you have not the slightest intention of carrying it out in practice. - Otto Von Bismark
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo

Supremes Hand USEPA the Hammer

Federalism reigns Supreme. Supreme Court that is.

In a riveting, 61-page opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency can overrule state courts when ordering anti-pollution measures, even if they entail increased costs.

What?

Well, look at it this way: the USEPA has final authority over the 50 states when it comes to air pollution, even if it means that the cost to implement pollution control devices is expensive. Same thing, different way.

The Clean Air Act gives initial authority to the states to regulate pollution control devices, but allows the USEPA to look over the states' shoulder. When the USEPA thinks the state is being too lenient, it can step in and order that the pollution control devices be installed, without regard to cost.

Big decision, big cost. Not good news for industries, but good news for environmentalists.

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 at 16:04 Comments Closed (0) |
 
Share Link